LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 132 › Logical Reasoning › Question 18

LSAT 132 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q18

LSAT Preptest 132 explanations

LR Question 18 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: If there are sentient beings on planets outside our…

QUESTION TYPE: Sufficient Assumption

CONCLUSION: We won’t know if there are aliens outside our solar system unless the aliens are as smart as us.

REASONING:

  1. We can’t send spaceships to aliens.
  2. If aliens were to send us messages, they’d have to be at least as smart as us.

ANALYSIS: I simplified the language in the conclusion/reasoning to make the argument clearer.

Now, you first must find the flaw, so your job is to imagine an alternate possibility. Pretend someone is paying you $50 to spot the flaw in this argument. Is there any other way we could figure out aliens exist, even if we can’t travel to them or receive messages?

Well, what about a telescope? There are other ways to discover what’s in the universe. The argument’s flaw is assuming that the two possibilities it gave are the only two possibilities for discovering aliens.

This is a sufficient assumption question, so you must prove this argument correct. The argument works if you assume that there are no other ways to discover the aliens. Then the argument will be correct. (This almost is a necessary assumption question)

Note that the argument is only talking about aliens outside the solar system. Note also that diagrams are not useful on this question, so I haven’t drawn any.

___________

  1. The argument is talking about aliens outside the solar system. This answer is irrelevant.
  2. The argument wasn’t saying that aliens will communicate with us if they’re as intelligent as us. The argument is saying that the only way we could possibly discover aliens is if they communicated with us.
  3. The stimulus already said we can’t send spaceships to planets outside our solar system. Since the conclusion is only about aliens on planets outside the solar system, this answer doesn’t help.
  4. CORRECT. This says that there are only two possibilities for discovering aliens:
    1. We send a spaceship.
    2. They communicate with us.
    The argument already eliminated the first possibility. And the second possibility only works if aliens are as smart as us. So this answer proves that the only way we’ll discover aliens outside our solar system is if they’re at least as smart as us.
  5. This gets things backwards. The argument didn’t say that we’d definitely hear from aliens if they were at least as smart as us. It said that we’d only hear from aliens if they were at least as smart as us.
    So this answer adds nothing. We’re trying to prove that sentient aliens are the only possibility for communication. So we need to show there are no other possibilities. Whether or not aliens actually do or can communicate with us doesn’t matter.

Recap: The question begins with “If there are sentient beings”. It is a Sufficient Assumption question. To practice more Sufficient Assumption questions, have a look at the LSAT Questions by Type page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 132
Next Question

More Resources for Sufficient Assumption Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: Learn conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Sufficient Assumption questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers sufficient assumption questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Edward says

    June 29, 2019 at 12:16 am

    Regarding the correct answer, I’m wondering if this is an easier way to think about it: “the only way to detect [sentient beings] existence is by sending a spacecraft to its planet” (necessary condition of the correct answer) AND “we will not be able to send spacecraft to planets outside our solar system anytime in the near future” (premise in the stimulus) then it follows that “we will not be able to determine [if sentient beings exist] anytime in the near future” (necessary condition of the conclusion).

    Reply
  2. Alia says

    June 6, 2017 at 2:38 pm

    Hi,
    For answer choice E I was wondering if this confuses something that is necessary for something that is sufficient because the speaker is saying that if we were to hear from sentinet beings they would have to be as intelligent as humans (necessary) but choice E makes it seems as if meeting this criteria means that we will absolutely hear from them. Thus confusing something that is necessary for something that is sufficient? I know that may not be totally clear but thank you in advance!

    Reply
    • Lucas (LSAT Hacks) says Tutor

      June 10, 2017 at 8:04 pm

      Yes, that’s correct. When Graeme says in the explanation that this answer choice “gets things backwards”, that’s what he means — that the necessary condition is being confused for the sufficient condition.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms